← Practice Management

Sheet G-115
PjMCE PcM

Dispute Resolutionconcept

Mediation vs arbitration vs litigation: three-way contrast

One-line orientation

Mediation, arbitration, and litigation are the three dispute methods in the AIA framework — tested by asking you to identify which is binding, which is private, and which is required first.

Key points

  • Mediation:
    • Non-binding, confidential, facilitated negotiation. A neutral third party (mediator) helps the parties communicate and reach a voluntary settlement; the mediator does not issue a ruling.
    • Required by AIA documents before the binding step can be invoked.
    • Mediation is generally faster and less costly because the parties negotiate instead of presenting a full case for a ruling. Outcome is only enforceable if the parties sign a written settlement.
  • Arbitration:
    • Binding (when elected in the agreement). A neutral arbitrator or panel hears evidence and renders a final decision that the parties are obligated to follow.
    • Private proceedings — not a matter of public record.
    • Limited discovery compared to litigation; limited grounds for appeal.
    • Generally faster and cheaper than litigation, though more expensive than mediation.
    • Arbitration is private and can limit the exchange of evidence, called discovery, and later review of the decision.
  • Litigation:
    • Binding. Conducted in public courts under the full rules of civil procedure.
    • Litigation follows court rules for discovery and appeal. It is generally more public, formal, slow, and costly than mediation.
    • Results are public record.
    • The agreement identifies the binding method. The parties may select litigation, arbitration, or another method.

Mediation → arbitration → litigation: least to most formal

Mediation is non-binding; the agreement selects arbitration, litigation, or another binding method.

View diagram Hide diagram

Scroll horizontally to explore

Mediation, arbitration and litigation compared on a least-to-most-formal axis Three columns compare mediation, arbitration, and litigation under a least-to-most-formal tendency. Mediation is non-binding and private; arbitration is binding if elected and private; litigation is binding and public when the agreement selects it. The final row states that arbitration rules commonly limit discovery and review, while litigation follows court rules for discovery and appeal. Cost and time are presented as general tendencies, not fixed rankings. least formalmost formal →binding?venuedecidesAIA rolecost + timediscovery · appealMediationprivate · confidentialno one — facilitatorrequired firstlownone · n/aArbitrationbinding if electedprivatearbitratoroptional — electedmidlimited · very limitedLitigationbindingjudge / juryif agreement selects itgenerally highcourt rules · appeal rulesnon-bindingpublic record

Confusions / comparison

MediationArbitrationLitigation
Binding?No — voluntary settlement onlyYes (if elected)Yes
Private / publicPrivate, confidentialPrivatePublic court record
Decision-makerNone — neutral facilitatesNeutral arbitrator(s)Judge / jury
DiscoveryNot an adjudicated evidence processCommonly limited by rules/agreementFollows court rules
Later reviewN/ANarrow grounds under governing law/rulesFollows appellate procedure
Relative speed / costGenerally lowestVaries; often between the other twoGenerally higher than mediation
AIA roleRequired first when the contract says soBinding if electedBinding if selected in the agreement

→ pp-dispute-resolution-ladder (this module): the required sequence — initial decision → mediation → binding step · pp-termination-suspension (this module): ending the contract vs. disputing it · ProPractice: AIA B101 Art. 8 and A201 Art. 15.

Spotted an issue with this card? Tell us →

Related units