Soilsconcept
Soil types and construction suitability: particle size, gradation, cohesion
One-line orientation
Particle size, gradation, density, moisture, and plasticity help describe how soil may bear, drain, and change volume. Foundation suitability comes from the full classification and site testing, not particle size alone.
Key points
- Particle-size scale (finest → coarsest): clay → silt → sand → gravel → cobbles/boulders. Cobbles and boulders are large enough to be hand-carried; generally stable but hard to compact uniformly.
- Coarse-grained soils (sand and gravel): strength comes mainly from friction and interlocking. Bearing and drainage depend on density, gradation, confinement, and moisture; coarse particle size alone does not guarantee a good foundation soil.
- Fine-grained soils need separate treatment: clay is cohesive and plastic. Silt is generally treated as granular unless it contains enough clay to become cohesive. Suitability still depends on the full classification, density or consistency, and moisture.
- Organic soils (peat, topsoil): unsuitable — highly compressible, low strength.
- Gradation:
- Well-graded = a good mix of fine-to-coarse sizes → denser, higher shear strength, better bearing, lower permeability. Best for foundations and roadbeds.
- Poorly graded = mostly one particle size → looser, lower shear strength, lower bearing, but better drainage.
- Note: “graded” is the inverse of “sorted” — a well-graded soil is poorly sorted.
Mineral soil size and gradation — plus the organic-soil exception
SchematicParticle symbols show relative size; behavior notes compare categories, not a continuous performance scale
View diagram Hide diagram
Scroll horizontally to explore
"Well-graded" = poorly sorted — graded and sorted are inverse terms
Confusions / comparison
| Coarse-grained (sand/gravel) | Fine-grained (silt/clay) | Organic (peat/topsoil) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bearing | Depends on density, gradation, and confinement | Depends on silt/clay classification, consistency, and moisture | Unsuitable |
| Drainage | Often better | Often slower | — |
| Volume change with moisture | Usually lower | Clay can shrink and swell; silt varies | — |
| Strength comes from | Mainly friction / interlocking | Clay: cohesion; silt may behave frictionally | — |
| Foundation use | Preferred | Difficult | Avoid / remove |
| Well-graded | Poorly graded | |
|---|---|---|
| Particle sizes | Good mix, fine to coarse | Mostly uniform |
| Density / compaction | Dense, compact | Loose |
| Shear strength / bearing | Higher | Lower |
| Drainage | Lower (less permeable) | Better |
| Best for | Foundations, roadbeds | Where drainage is the goal |
Related
→ Soil properties (this module): bearing capacity, shear strength, Atterberg limits quantify these soils · Soil liquefaction (this module): why loose granular soils fail in earthquakes · Geotech testing (this module): how the soil type is actually determined on site.
Spotted an issue with this card? Tell us →
Related units
ratings update your review schedule ·
Round complete